Andrew Davidhazy


[Lunar Eclipse 01-21-00]

Lunar Eclipse 01-21-00 - photo 1

After a less than favorable start to this event, with snow and clouds prevalent in the Rochester area, this photograph was made at 5 minutes after midnight, local time in Rochester, NY, USA on January 21, 2000 during the total lunar eclipse that started on the evening of the 20th. I believe this was during the total eclipse or maybe just as the moon was emering into the penumbra. and exhibited a characteristic reddish color as a result. There is a larger image file of this same photograph 40 Kb image of eclipse here.

The photograph was made with a Nikon 950 digital camera held close to the eyepiece of a Meyer-Optik Telemegor 400mm f/5.5 lens (and used wide open) to which a 50mm focal length eyepiece had been attached. This lens was originally made to fit an Exacta camera.

The Nikon was set to maximum wide angle setting and the shutter, set to automatic but at +2 exposure value, seemed to operate for an exposure time of about two seconds. This was determined by listening to the noises the camera operate after pressing the shutter button. It sounded like this: ... whirrr ... click ... one missisippi ... two missisippi .. click - picture on LCD!

The outside temperature was about 3 degrees F at the time. It was _cold_! As stated above there was no coupling from camera to eyepiece ... just holding it by hand.

[Lunar Eclipse 01-21-00]

Lunar Eclipse 01-21-00 - photo 2

After I prepared the photograph at the top for this page I happened to look out the window and the skies had become completely clear and I noticed the characteristic curved shadow of the Earth cutting into the moon's disc and decided I had been looking at a monitor when I should have been outside continuing to witness the eclipse. I hurriedly reset-up the scope and gathered up the cameras again and zoomed out into the frigid air. Made this one above 1 am (the exposure time was quite short now ... much shorter than 1 second according to sound made by shutter) plus a few more photographs before the cold chased me back indoors! Oh, I even stopped the lens down to between f/11 and 8 for this second photo session. I wonder how I will wake up this morning ... it is already 1:30 pm

Bigger version located here

Both of these photographs were made through the "telescope" and so are upside down and reversed in relation to unaided view of the event. They are presented here as seen through the telescope (although I could have easily flipped them while preparing them. In fact, I forgot about this "quirk" associated with images made through telescopes! I have one photograph made without the aid of a scope and it shows the position of the Moon in relation to the stars. It is included below. Of course this is an "unreversed" view but to tell the truth I forget the orientation. It was made at the widest angle setting on the camera and includes some stars (planets?) that may provide guidance as to the actual orientation of the photograph.

[Lunar 
Eclipse 01-21-00]

Lunar Eclipse 01-21-00 - photo 3

Bigger version located here

BTW, if you know during which time during the eclipse these were made based on the time at which I took them I would much appreciate knowing that. Sure, I could search that out myself but if you have the info at your fingertips and you don't mind sharing ... that would save me the task!! ;-)

Finally, I also made some photographs on T-Max 400 with a Canon A1 attached to the 400mm lens but these will be processed later. The battery driving the A1 failed due to cold and I had to warm it up twice above a stove to "save the day" but it was a pain anyway. Should have used a mechanical camera or an external source of power kept in a pocked. On the other hand, the digital versions above, for me, are already good enough and the color is nice to have. If I had been truly prepared I would have 1. prepared for the cold, 2. used color film, 3. used tracking and 4. would have gotten some sleep beforehand!

You can send e-mail to the author at:
andpph@rit.edu
You can see more of the author's photography at:
http://www.rit.edu/~andpph

Thank you,
Andrew Davidhazy


ADDENDUM: I received the following e-mail that explains the position of the moon relative to the shadow of the Earth in response to the question I asked above:

Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 19:06:12 -0500
From: Dahl Clark
Subject: total lunar eclipse

My name's Dahl Clark, a friend of Dr. Loren Winters (you might know him) and stationed at Duke University, NC. I happened to be out in the *cold* (boy, it was cold!) during the entire first half of the total eclipse with my Astronomy class, and I know the stages of the eclipse during which your two photos were taken at eclipse-01-20-00.html.

Photo 1: Taken at "five minutes after midnight," the moon is now completely in the umbra, which is where all traces of direct sunlight has vanished from the moon's surface due to the Earth's shadow.

Since we're both located in the same time zone, the moon began its course through the Earth's umbral shadow at 10:01 pm. That was when the moon was bright and full, but one side of it was gradually becoming blackened). (The eclipse actually started at 9:02 pm, when the moon was passing through the penumbra, Earth's lighter shadow.) At 11:04 pm, the entire moon was within the umbra; the Earth's shadow completely covered the moon, and the moon was red, as seen in your Photo 1. This condition, "totality," lasted for 78 minutes until 12:22 am. At 12:05 pm, which was when you took Photo 1, the moon had almost completed its passage through the umbra.

Photo 2: Totality lasted until 12:22, and the moon continued moving out of the umbra until 1:25 am, when the moon was completely out of the umbra. At 1 am, when you took Photo 2, the full moon would have been partially shadowed because it was in the process of emerging from the umbra.

(The real eclipse took place from 9:02 pm - 2:24 am, but the most dramatic portion, when the Moon passes through the Earth's umbra, lasted from 10:01 pm - 1:25 am.)

I really enjoyed looking at your pictures! I tried taking some myself with a digital camera on a tripod; none of my pictures looked as spectacular as yours. (Magnification helps!) It was also somewhat windy here that night, although we had clear skies for excellent viewing. I hope some of this stuff helps out!

Dahl