Since
October 2008, the federal government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program
(TARP) has distributed to parts of the U.S. auto industry more than $80
billion of taxpayer funds – some $800 per American taxpaying
family. While roughly $30 billion had been repaid by mid-January
2011, the Congressional Oversight Panel [1], which monitors bailout
programs, concluded on January 13, 2011 that full repayment is not
likely ever to occur. This is truly an expensive bailout or
subsidy, but the U.S. economic structure is suffused with many such
subsidies, both short-term and continuing. For example, from $10
billion to $30 billion annually flows from the federal budget to
farmers [2]. Many other subsidies are hidden: the price paid by
US consumers for sugar is far higher than the world price because the
government restricts sugar imports in order to assist domestic sugar
producers; one result is that US candy manufacturers are
internationally disadvantaged in competing with foreign-based
manufacturers.
The merit of the US governments's corporate subsidies programs are
contentious. Our agent-based modeling approach to such policy
show an intriguingly suggestive perspective on subsidy programs,
calling into question both their efficiency and fairness. Our
hypothesis is that government subsidies affect and downgrade the entire
economy, and companies that undergo bankruptcy have a higher
probability of its recurrence.